Comparative Study on Access to Rights and Services and Strategies to Address Non-Take-Up

Here’s the full English translation of your text, keeping the formal and academic tone intact:

As evidenced by multiple studies and reports, the fight against non-take-up of benefits and services constitutes a major political objective. This goal is shared by a growing number of social protection organizations worldwide.

To better understand this issue, the present comparative study on access and the fight against non-take-up of rights and services will be structured into three parts.

• The first part, with a rather theoretical orientation, will clarify the concepts necessary for understanding this issue.

• The second part is devoted to a review of the most recent international comparisons.

These first two sections make it possible to grasp the stakes and the origins of this issue in the evaluation of public policies. They serve as a theoretical foundation for the following section, which aims to show, in a more operational way, how social security institutions act.

In this perspective, the third part draws on good practices centralized by the ISSA (International Social Security Association), bilateral interviews, as well as the analysis of reports and documents from institutions in foreign countries. The selected examples illustrate how social protection organizations act concretely to promote access to rights and services by:

• improving communication;

• carrying out outreach actions toward potential beneficiaries;

• digitizing procedures to foster digital inclusion;

• automating processes.

These examples reveal the creativity and diversity of solutions developed by different organizations to address common challenges and ultimately promote access to rights and services.

Would you like me to adapt this translation into a more fluent, less academic English (for example, suitable for a presentation or a wider audience), or do you prefer to keep the formal research style?